#pentagram@irc.freenode.net logs for 17 May 2005 (GMT)

Archive Today Yesterday Tomorrow
Pentagram homepage

[00:17:08] --> Kirben has joined #pentagram
[00:17:08] --- ChanServ gives channel operator status to Kirben
09:20 -!- sbx [sbx@] has quit []
09:20 -!- sbx [~sbx@] has joined #pentagram
09:20 -!- Darklock [jonas@dsl-084-056-111-126.arcor-ip.net] has quit [Read error: 145 (Connection timed out)]
09:28 -!- Darklock [jonas@dsl-084-056-114-072.arcor-ip.net] has joined #Pentagram
15:12 -!- sbx [~sbx@] has quit ["BRB"]
15:15 -!- sbx [sbx@] has joined #pentagram
15:18 -!- Colourless [~triforce@ppp238-51.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net] has quit ["casts improved invisibility"]
16:54 -!- Kirben [kirben@c220-237-37-206.brasd1.vic.optusnet.com.au] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)]
19:44 -!- sbx is now known as sbx|afk
21:04 -!- Darke [~Darke@ppp189-8.static.internode.on.net] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)]
21:21 -!- Darke [~Darke@ppp189-8.static.internode.on.net] has joined #pentagram
23:02 <@wjp> Flame Sting is annoying
23:08 <@wjp> first have to show a fire sprite, then a persistent (non-sprite) flame object for a while, and then a sprite of disappearing flame
23:11 <@wjp> so we'll need a process that creates an item, and a way of playing a sprite in the future
23:14 <@wjp> future sprites is probably a simple matter of adding an option to the SpriteProcess constructor that makes it delay the sprite creation to the first time it runs
23:18 -!- Fingolfin [Fingolfin@fingolfin.user] has joined #pentagram
23:18 -!- mode/#pentagram [+o Fingolfin] by ChanServ
23:24 <@wjp> hi Fingolfin
23:25 <@Fingolfin> yo
23:26 <@wjp> hm, new SF stats system expected to go live next monday?
23:26 <@wjp> _and_ they put in place new spam filters, I see; that explains the sudden drop in german spam since monday :-)
23:28 * wjp grins at SF's 'project ranking formule change' note. I'm surprised they kept the useless factors inside the logarithms around until now
23:36 <@Fingolfin> *cough*
23:36 <@Fingolfin> they knew that they were bogus for a couple years now, of course... :-)
23:38 <@wjp> I know :-)